Table of Contents
Many workers want to know if they can sue their employer while still employed, or if they must quit or be fired first. In California, you can sue your employer while still employed, and state law bars retaliation for bringing a claim. Below, we explain which laws protect you, what can happen at work while a claim is pending, and when resolving the dispute without a lawsuit may be the better route.
Can You Sue Your Employer While Still Employed?
Yes. California’s anti-retaliation laws protect current employees who bring claims. Government Code section 12940(h) bars retaliation against a person who has filed a complaint, testified, or assisted in a proceeding under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). FEHA employment claims also require a right-to-sue notice from the Civil Rights Department before a case can go to court.
Yes. You can sue your employer while still employed, and several California laws protect current employees who complain or bring a claim. Which law applies depends on the problem. Discrimination and harassment claims fall under FEHA. Unpaid wages fall under the Labor Code. Reports of illegal activity fall under the state’s whistleblower law.
Under Gov. Code section 12940(h), an employer may not discharge or otherwise punish someone for opposing discrimination or harassment, filing a complaint, or taking part in a FEHA proceeding. Labor Code section 98.6 protects employees who file “a bona fide complaint or claim” or start a proceeding before the Labor Commissioner. Labor Code section 1102.5 protects employees who report what they reasonably believe is a violation of state or federal law, which our page on whistleblower protections covers in more depth.
| Type of problem | Main California law | What the law bars | Extra protection |
| Discrimination or harassment | FEHA, Gov. Code 12940(h) | Punishing you for opposing it, complaining, or helping in a proceeding | Harassers can be personally liable under 12940(j)(3) |
| Unpaid wages or other Labor Code rights | Labor Code 98.6 | Punishing you for a wage complaint or claim | Presumption of retaliation within 90 days; civil penalty up to $10,000 per violation |
| Reporting a violation of law | Labor Code 1102.5 | Punishing you for disclosing a suspected violation | Employer must prove its reason by clear and convincing evidence once retaliation is shown to be a contributing factor |
Other complaints have their own protections. If you raised a workplace safety issue, see our article on whether you can be fired for a safety complaint.
Not lawfully, if the claim is the reason. Firing an employee for bringing a protected claim is retaliation, and it can create a separate legal claim on top of the original one. California is an at-will employment state, though, so an employer may still end employment for a lawful reason that has nothing to do with your claim. A stated reason such as “we no longer need this role” does not settle the question. What matters is whether the reason is legitimate and independent of the claim.
Two rules help employees prove retaliation. Under Labor Code section 98.6(b)(1), adverse action within 90 days of protected activity creates “a rebuttable presumption in favor of the employee’s claim.” For whistleblower claims, once an employee shows the protected activity was “a contributing factor,” the employer must prove “by clear and convincing evidence” that it would have acted anyway “for legitimate, independent reasons” (Labor Code section 1102.6). The California Supreme Court confirmed that framework in Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. (2022).
Retaliation does not have to be a firing. In Yanowitz v. L’Oreal USA, Inc. (2005), the court held that an action is adverse when it “materially affect[s] the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment.” It added that “there is no requirement that an employer’s retaliatory acts constitute one swift blow,” so a series of smaller actions can be considered together. Write-ups, cut hours, lost assignments, and exclusion from meetings may add up. Our article on the average settlement for a retaliation lawsuit explains what these claims can recover.
Usually, you keep working. If you sue your employer while still employed, your employer still sets your duties and still expects your normal performance. Retaliation laws protect you from punishment for the claim, not from ordinary management decisions made for legitimate reasons.
A lawsuit also brings discovery, the stage where each side gathers evidence. California lets a party seek information about “any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter” of the case (Code of Civil Procedure section 2017.010). In practice, the questions can be broad.
Your own records can show what changed after the claim. Notes made at the time, written requests, and the employer’s written replies can show what changed and when. Our article on what to document when you experience workplace misconduct lists the records that tend to matter. If conditions become so intolerable that you are thinking about resigning, read about constructive discharge in California and consider speaking with an employment lawyer before resigning.
It depends. Employees and employers sometimes settle a dispute before anyone files a lawsuit, through a demand letter, a negotiation, or a negotiated exit. Lawyers call this the prelitigation stage. These factors usually shape the choice.
An employment attorney can evaluate whether informal resolution or a lawsuit better fits your situation.
It depends on the claim. For FEHA employment claims, the Civil Rights Department says you must submit an intake form within three years of the date you were last harmed. A retaliation complaint to the Labor Commissioner generally must be filed “within one year after the occurrence of the violation” under Labor Code section 98.7. Wage claims have their own periods, which our article on how long a wage claim takes in California covers.
A right-to-sue notice also starts a separate clock for filing in court, and staying employed does not pause any of these deadlines. An employment attorney can evaluate which deadlines apply to your situation.
Common claims include discrimination or harassment based on a protected trait under FEHA, unpaid minimum wage or overtime under Labor Code section 1194, and a refused or punished family leave under Government Code section 12945.2. Retaliation for raising any of these is a separate claim. Our article on your legal protections against workplace discrimination lists the protected traits.
It can. FEHA protects a person who “has opposed any practices forbidden under this part” (Gov. Code section 12940(h)), and an internal complaint about discrimination or harassment can be that kind of opposition. Our article on filing a harassment complaint at work explains the reporting options.
No, not lawfully. FEHA bars retaliation against a person who “testified, or assisted in any proceeding under this part” (Gov. Code section 12940(h)). The protection covers witnesses, not only the person who filed.
For harassment, yes. Under Gov. Code section 12940(j)(3), an employee “is personally liable for any harassment prohibited by this section.” Whether you can name a supervisor in other claims depends on the type of claim.
Yes. Labor Code section 98.6(a) protects an employee who has “filed a bona fide complaint or claim” or started a proceeding before the Labor Commissioner. Retaliation for that claim can lead to reinstatement and reimbursement for lost wages and work benefits.
It can, if you agree to it. California allows the parties to a settlement to “End a current employment relationship” under Code of Civil Procedure section 1002.5. The same law voids a settlement term that bars you from working for the employer in the future, with limited exceptions, such as a documented good-faith finding of sexual harassment made before the claim.
Possibly, for some claims. Under federal law, a person alleging sexual harassment or sexual assault can elect to make a predispute arbitration agreement unenforceable for that case (9 U.S.C. section 402). For other claims, whether the agreement applies depends on its terms and the facts.
Usually at least 21 days. To waive federal age discrimination claims, the agreement must give you at least 21 days to consider it (45 days in a group program) and at least 7 days to revoke after signing. It must also advise you in writing to consult an attorney.
Generally, no, if the conversation is confidential. Penal Code section 632 bars recording a confidential communication “intentionally and without the consent of all parties.” Written notes made right after a conversation are a safer record.
If you are thinking about whether to sue your employer while still employed, and you believe you were discriminated against, harassed, underpaid, or punished for speaking up, consider speaking with a California employment lawyer. A lawyer can review whether you have a claim, whether to try informal resolution first, and which deadlines apply. Early advice can also help before you sign a severance agreement or decide whether to resign. These situations often raise retaliation questions, and our Los Angeles employment lawyers represent California employees.
At Abramson Labor Group, we represent California employees facing retaliation and workplace violations. Our case reviews are free and confidential, and we work on contingency. Request your free case evaluation, contact us, or call us at (213) 493-6300.
Last updated: October 28, 2026
This article is general information about California law, not legal advice. Every situation is different. For advice about your specific case, talk to a licensed California employment attorney.
Abramson Labor Group offers 100% risk free case evaluations. Fill out the form below or call us today!
Prefer to talk? (213) 493-6300
1700 W Burbank Blvd, Burbank, CA 91506